Talk:Two-phase Reviewing
From Health of Conferences Committee
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 19:56, 28 February 2006 MarkDHill (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 19:58, 28 February 2006 MarkDHill (Talk | contribs) Next diff → |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| == Starting Comments == | == Starting Comments == | ||
| - | This is more negatively, called ''quick rejection.'' For example, ICSE has used this | + | This is more negatively, called ''quick rejection.'' Papers must pass an initial |
| - | approach and SIGGRAPH has considered it. Papers must pass an initial | + | |
| review by two or three reviewers before being circulated for a full complement | review by two or three reviewers before being circulated for a full complement | ||
| of five or six reviews. | of five or six reviews. | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 28 February 2006
To add your comment to this discussion, please click the + sign tab above. Like an email message, you can then contribute:
- a subject (use subject Re: FOO to continue a discussion of FOO)
- message body
- (optionally) your name.
Starting Comments
This is more negatively, called quick rejection. Papers must pass an initial review by two or three reviewers before being circulated for a full complement of five or six reviews.
